| Zone | Power Range | % FTP | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zone 1: Active Recovery | < 127w | < 55% | Easy spinning. Promoting blood flow. |
| Zone 2: Endurance | 129 - 173w | 56-75% | All day pace. Fat oxidation base. |
| Zone 3: Tempo | 175 - 207w | 76-90% | Aerobic interval pace. "Sweet Spot" is high Zone 3. |
| Zone 4: Threshold (Lactate) | 209 - 242w | 91-105% | Race pace. Burning legs. 10-20 min efforts. |
| Zone 5: VO2 Max | 244 - 276w | 106-120% | 3-8 min max efforts. Gasping for air. |
| Zone 6: Anaerobic Capacity | 278 - 345w | 121-150% | 30s - 3 min efforts. Very painful. |
| Zone 7: Neuromuscular Power | > 347w | > 151% | All out sprints. < 30 seconds. |
Sweet Spot Recommendation
For efficient aerobic gains, target 202w - 216w. This provides the best 'bang for your buck' increase in FTP with manageable fatigue.
The formula
Energy (kcal) = Average Power (watts) × Duration (seconds) / (4186 × Gross Efficiency)
Full derivation and the conditions it holds under are in Method and basis, below.
Method and basis
How the figure above is derived, and when not to act on it.
How Cycling Calorie Expenditure is Calculated
When you have a power meter, caloric expenditure is precise:
Energy (kcal) = Average Power (watts) × Duration (seconds) / (4186 × Gross Efficiency)
Typical gross efficiency for trained cyclists: 20–25%. At 23% efficiency:
Energy (kcal) ≈ Average Watts × Duration (hours) × 3.6 / 0.23 ≈ Watts × Hours × 15.65
Example:** 200W average for 2 hours = **200 × 2 × 15.65 ≈ 6,260 kJ ≈ 1,495 kcal
Without a power meter, speed-based estimates are used, but these carry ±15–25% error due to wind, terrain, and drafting variables.
On-Bike Fuelling Requirements
The limiting factor in cycling performance beyond ~75 minutes is glycogen depletion, not fitness. Fuelling strategy is a trainable skill.
| Duration | Carbohydrate Target | Fluid Target |
|---|---|---|
| < 60 min | Unnecessary (mouth rinse only) | 500–750 mL/h |
| 60–90 min | 30–40 g/h | 500–750 mL/h |
| 90 min – 3 hrs | 60 g/h | 750–1,000 mL/h |
| > 3 hours | 90 g/h (mixed glucose + fructose) | 750–1,000 mL/h |
Calories Burned by Effort Level
| Intensity | Example | Approx. kcal/hour (75 kg rider) |
|---|---|---|
| Zone 1 (Recovery) | Easy spin | 300–400 kcal |
| Zone 2 (Endurance) | Long ride | 500–700 kcal |
| Zone 3 (Tempo) | Group ride pace | 700–900 kcal |
| Zone 4 (Threshold) | Hard interval | 900–1,100 kcal |
| Zone 5 (VO₂ Max) | VO₂ intervals | 1,000–1,200 kcal |
Post-Ride Recovery Fuelling
After rides exceeding 90 minutes, the priority order is: 1. Carbohydrates (within 30 min): 1–1.2 g/kg body weight per hour for first 4 hours 2. Protein (within 45 min): 20–40 g to stimulate muscle protein synthesis 3. Fluid: Replace 125–150% of sweat losses over 2–4 hours 4. Sodium: 500–1,000 mg with your recovery meal to trigger thirst and aid rehydration
Why Calorie Counting Alone Misleads Cyclists
The quality of fuel source matters as much as quantity: * Fat provides 9 kcal/g but delivers ATP too slowly for efforts above ~65% VO₂ max. * Carbohydrate provides only 4 kcal/g but fuels high-intensity work at rates 3× faster than fat oxidation. * Training in Zone 2 increases fat oxidation rates, which spares glycogen for hard efforts — this is why "base miles" matter even for criterium racers.
WinSport Editorial & Research Standards
All formulas and reference values used in this tool are sourced from peer-reviewed scientific literature and validated clinical guidelines. Our research team continuously audits each calculator for accuracy and updates methodology as new evidence emerges.
Read the Science
Sports Science Articles- Cycling Calories and Fuelling: The Calculation Most Riders Get WrongGeneric cycling calorie calculators are wildly inaccurate. Power output, rider weight, gradient, and drafting all interact in ways that simple MET-based formulas completely ignore.5 min read
- Cycling Aerodynamics: How CdA Converts Power Into SpeedAerodynamic drag dominates cycling power demand above 25 km/h. Understanding CdA and the power-speed cube law shows where your watts are actually going — and where the biggest savings are.5 min read
- Why Your Cycling Calorie Calculator Lies at Altitude — And What to Do About ItAt 2,000+ metres, standard cycling calorie formulas underestimate your energy burn by 6–12%. Here's the hypoxic physiology behind the gap.5 min read
Explore More Tools
View All Tools- What Is VAM in Cycling? VAM Calculator & BenchmarksVAM (Velocità Ascensionale Media) measures your vertical ascent rate in m/hour. Calculate your VAM for any climb and benchmark against recreational and WorldTour pro levels.
- CdA Calculator — Drag Area from Power and SpeedSolve your drag area from a measured power and speed, with air density computed from pressure, temperature and humidity rather than assumed.
- Crank Length Calculator — What the Evidence Actually SupportsGet the only published crank-length ratios there are, how little of the variance they explain, and the saddle-height change a new crank length actually requires.
Get the weekly research brief
One email per week. New calculators, methodology updates, and sports science summaries.